The terrorist attack on the big concert held in the Moscow region on Friday, March 22, has already claimed 143 lives. 80 of the seriously injured are still ill. Some of them are children. The death toll may therefore still rise.
11 people have been arrested for the attack. Four of them are citizens of Tajikistan who have been proven guilty of the actual act, who have confessed that they committed the attack in exchange for a monetary reward.
The Russian authorities continue to investigate the background of the attack and, above all, who ordered the attack.
The Russian authorities are also currently investigating the actions of Western intelligence services, and above all the intelligence services of the United States, Britain and Ukraine, and possible connections to the terrorist attack and its perpetrators. Cooperation is carried out e.g. with the authorities of Tajikistan and Turkey.
The Finnish media have strongly disapproved of the reports of the Russian authorities, which focus, among other things, on the possible connections of those who carried out the attack to Ukraine and why they were fleeing towards the Ukrainian border.
At the same time, almost all major Finnish media – Helsingin Sanomat, Yleisradio, MTV, Iltasanomat, Iltalehti and also the news agency STT and its client newspapers – have published accusations claiming that the Russian security authorities carried out the terrorist attack in Moscow. The media has also claimed the Russian president Vladimir Putin having been personally responsible for the decisions regarding the attack.
The accusations have been published in the Finnish media as if they were confirmed facts.
Helsingin Sanomat accused Putin of "mass shooting and fire"
Helsingin Sanomat published about the terrorist attack in Moscow late on Saturday evening, 23.3. a story in which the country's leading newspaper reported that the Central Intelligence Agency of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine blamed the Russian security services and "the country's autocratic president" Vladimir Putin about the "mass shooting and fire".
According to the newspaper, the Ukrainian intelligence agency said in Telegram that "the attack was carried out on the orders of President Putin". The motive is said to be the "expansion and escalation of the war" in Ukraine.
The article published by Helsingin Sanomat was written by STT's editor Elisa Airasvirta. The newspaper does not question the claim of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine in a single word and does not comment on its validity. It was published as truth.
Ambassador Himanen: The organizers of Veriteo can be found in the Russian security services
After the attack, the Finnish media found "experts" to interview, who directly blamed the Russian authorities and President Putin for the attack.
Finnish media often use the former Finnish ambassador to Moscow as an "expert". Hannu From Hima, which with its statements has created an image of Russia's participation in the planning and execution of the terrorist attack in Moscow.
Yle in the morning of 25.3. the interviewed Himanen said that he considers it "completely possible" that the "organizers of the massacre can be found in the Russian security services". Himanen interviewed by MTV news a couple of days earlier said that he himself does not speculate on the perpetrators of the attack, but says that everything is possible.
Also "guest leading expert" of the Foreign Policy Institute Olli Ruohomäki threw in Iltasanomit 25.3. suspicion of Russian involvement in the Moscow attack. According to him, there is a possibility that the attack was a Russian false flag operation. That is, a "false flag operation", with which Ruohomäki refers that the perpetrators of the attack were completely different from what the Russian security services have told.
In an interview with Iltasanomit, Ruohomäki also doubts whether the arrested men are the real perpetrators of the attack. Ruohomäki repeated his doubts in an interview with Yle on the same day.
Yle published on 25.3. also a research doctor of the Estonian Defense Research Center to Igor Gretsky interview, in which he considered it possible that someone in the Russian security service "could have hoped for or even directed it", i.e. a terrorist attack. He also did not rule out that "the security service FSP planned the attack."
According to the research doctor, the fact that the perpetrators managed to escape from Moscow all the way to Bryansk in the same car in which they had come to the crime scene suggests that some of the security services "knew about the terrorists and the attack in advance and allowed it to happen".
Yle also published on 24.3. the news that Ukrainian military intelligence accuses the Russian regime of organizing an attack against its own citizens to justify more aggressive military measures in Ukraine.
Even professors embarrass themselves
Also the professor of world politics at the University of Helsinki Teivo Teivainen does not consider Russian involvement impossible.
He says in Iltalehti on March 23.3 that if Russia is involved in the attack, it is more likely that Russia would have allowed the attack to happen than that Russia would have ordered the attack. Iltasanomat also published Teivainen's interview on 25.3. Even in this interview, the professor does not rule out the possibility that Russia would also be involved in the attack in one way or another.
"That's where the possible interpretations vary from Putin's government having organized this to such that it was known that something like this might be coming," says Teivainen.
Teivais was interviewed again in Iltalehti on 27.3. Now the professor estimates that the attack can damage Putin's reputation, on the other hand, he can turn the aftermath of the attack to his advantage. However, the professor also reiterates the possibility of Russia's participation "in some way" in the attack.
"It is not completely ruled out that the [Russian] authorities helped or enabled the attack in some way, but I have not seen any signs of that," says Teivainen.
Teivainen also says that Putin can use the concern caused by the attack as a basis for suppressing the opposition.
"Putin may try to find ways to use the attack in the war against Ukraine as well, although no very credible examples have been brought forward".
Also a professor at the Alexander Institute Marianna Muravyena even considers it possible that, for example, the Russian security service FSB was organizing the attack. "I'm not saying it happened, but it's a possibility".
"I am cynical and I even believe that Russia allowed this to happen," said Iltasanom on 24.3. interviewed as Muravya.
Iltalehti and Iltasanomat active in blaming Russia
After the terrorist attack, the afternoon newspapers have been exceptionally active in interviewing "experts" who were willing to bring up Russia's possible involvement in the execution or planning of the attack.
Editor of Iltalehti Anne Salminen found 24.3. such an "expert" from the Swedish magazine Afronbladet. "Terrorism Researcher" interviewed in a Swedish magazine Hans Brun considers as one option the so-called false flag operation.
"It means an operation carried out by the Russian authorities themselves, perhaps in order to get a justification for a massive mobilization. This has happened before," says Brun. Ruotsalaislehti asks the researcher if the alternative is plausible. Brun says it's possible.
"It sounds terrible, but at the beginning of the century we saw a series of such attacks. There were bombings targeting rental apartments, where many Russian civilians were murdered," says Brun.
Evening news Seppo Varjus he also took his cards to the speculation pile on 25.3. in his published comment. According to him, the first possibility was that it was a staging. "The purpose would be that Putin could blame the act on Ukraine and accelerate the war there."
Another possibility, according to Varjus, was that "the attack was genuine, but the Russian security authorities allowed it to happen. The purpose would be that Putin could blame the act on Ukraine and accelerate the war there.
And as a third possibility, Varjus considers that Isis carried out the attack on its own time without the security authorities noticing it. "Putin still blames the act on Ukraine and accelerates the war there".
Also editor of Iltasanomit Ina Kauppinen said quite soon after the attack (March 22.3 at 21.30:XNUMX p.m.) that the "Legion of Free Russia" blames "Vladimir Putin and Russian security officials for the staged attack".
The same reporter continued at 21.51:XNUMX with new news that, according to the Ukrainian intelligence service, it is a deliberate provocation by Putin's security services. The reporter quoted a representative of Ukraine's military intelligence Andrei Yusovia, who had commented on the events for the Ukrainian Pravda.
"This is a deliberate provocation by Putin's security services, which the international community warned against. The Kremlin tyrant started his career with this and wants to end it with the same crimes against his own citizens," stated Yusov.
Iltasanomat or its editor did not in any way question the claim they reported. It was treated like truthful news. And the news was published several times that same evening.
Reporter of evening news Iina Niskanen published on 23.3. at 20.04:XNUMX p.m. a story in which he gives extensive column space to the adviser to the Ukrainian Minister of the Interior To Anton Herashtshenko.
The adviser casts doubt on the fact that the security guards of the concert hall did not resist the attack and were not among the dead and injured, the attackers were not checked upon entry and the metal detectors were reportedly turned off before the attackers arrived.
Coalition member of parliament: We cannot be sure that Putin's own administration is not behind the attacks
Along with the media, some politicians - mainly from the coalition - shift the responsibility for the terrorist attack to Russia. Some, on the other hand, accuse Russia in advance of intending to use terrorist attack after terrorist attack as a pretext for expanding the war in Ukraine.
Member of Parliament of the Coalition Timo Heinonen says that we cannot be sure that Putin's own administration and the Kremlin would not be behind the attack. Everything is possible in Russia.
According to Heinonen, the country has become dangerous not only for foreigners but also for its own people. "Russia is no longer just a superpower of lies," says a member of parliament from the coalition on 26.3. on their own websites.
He does admit that "at the moment, all the signs point to a genuine Islamist terrorist attack, which the United States also warned Russia about in advance."
"Now it seems that the attack in Moscow is being used in the same way as a justification for even tougher measures against Ukraine," stated Heinonen.
According to him, it seems clear that Russia's grip on its own people is tightening. "Launching the business is definitely the next steps. More and more young Russians are being sent to Ukraine to die. And only and only Putin's madness".
Member of Parliament Jarmo Limnell (cook) considers Russian terrorist attacks to have several consequences for the country's internal security arrangements and the war in Ukraine.
"As a result of the attacks in Moscow, the Kremlin is likely to justify the need for a new mobilization for the war in Ukraine, emphasize the seriousness of the security situation and tighten internal security arrangements," claims Linmell.
The terrorist act that took place in Moscow over the weekend may affect President Putin's position, estimates the member of parliament of the coalition. According to him, the blow to the heart of the country showed the vulnerability of Russia's current administration and intelligence.
"I would think that internal discipline in Russia, such actions of the police state, will become even tighter through this," said Limnell in an MTV news interview on March 25.3.
The third parliament member of the coalition Pekka Toveri guessed that "those arrested for the attack will probably soon confess that they are on the payroll of Ukraine, but the fact is that a day in a Russian prison, and you will tell and confess just about anything".
"In a democratic country, the police do not abuse"
MTV Uutiset reported on Wednesday 27.3. that he showed arrest videos related to the Moscow terrorist attack to two former police officers of the Bear Group, one of whom was Harry Gustafsberg.
"In a democratic state, the police do not act in a situation where people are beaten after being arrested. No way, no matter how many terrible things happened," claimed Gustafsberg.
"But this country has given up on this kind of democratic way of thinking a long time ago," says the former police officer.
The former police officer of the Bear Group seems to be completely unaware of, for example, what happened to those arrested in France, the so-called with the yellow vests protesting against the policies of the country's government. Or in dozens of other countries that the ex-policeman probably thinks are democratic countries.
In the United States, for example, the police have abused tens of thousands of detainees and also killed many. And how can a former police officer be completely ignorant, for example of George Floyd about death?
Floyd was choked upon arrest, and the detainee's murder led to nationwide protests in every US state. One police officer was sentenced to more than 22 years in prison for the murder.
The MTV story was done by a journalist Juho Lauri, who has had nothing to comment on Gustafsberg's speeches.
Suomen Tietotoimisto as a syltty factory
A considerable part of the accusations, according to which the Russian authorities and President Putin himself are to blame for the planning and execution of the terrorist attack in Moscow, originate from STT, or the Finnish Information Agency. STT's customer magazines around the country publish the stories as they are.
STT's output was, for example, about the accusations of the Central Intelligence Agency of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, where the Russian security services and the country's president were accused of mass shootings and fires. The original news story with interviews was published in the Ukrainian publication The Kiev Independent.
The Ukrainian military intelligence has published its baseless claims in Telegram, from which the Ukrainian newspaper had picked them up. The story was noticed in STT - after all, it was published in English - and it became news, which the customer magazines then either published as is or changed. None of the Finnish media that published STT's story, either in full or abridged, bothered to find out whether the story was true or not.
The practice of individual Finnish newspapers nowadays seems to be that the responsibility for the veracity of the story lies with the one who originally wrote the story, and not with the one who publishes it.
40 comments on the post “Finnish media blames Russia for the terrorist attack"
Reply
You must log in to comment.
When people can be made to believe anything, they can be fed anything. Yle and other so-called the mainstream media has been shackled once and for all. There really is no going back from this.
All respect to Mauno Saare for the analysis.
A few basic questions?
-Russia's enemies are? I'm not just talking about the West as a general word-
-is it possible that Russia's actions in, for example, Afghanistan would also be
created suspicion and even fear of Russia?
-still a conspiracy-theorize against: why the fsb was unable to prevent the crime-why the train moved 340 km
before the fsb discovered the situation?
I don't have any information about what is happening, not only in the power of this media of ours. Anyone who knows should write.
-
I'm not really an "expert", but I follow quite a lot of media in different languages, and based on them, I think that ISIS and other similar terrorist organizations may indeed have animosity towards Russia. In Syria, Russia has been helping the government fight against terrorist organizations - and over the past year it has expanded this activity in Sahelian African countries, where Russian mercenaries (formerly Wagner) have replaced French forces in this role. This is at least partly the background of Macron's furious desire to make Russia lose in Ukraine at any cost, because French troops have not continued their presence in these former French colonies just for the sake of goodness, but are also there to ensure that France gets the raw materials it needs from them at an agreed price - and now Africans have preferred to make a deal with Russia.
However, the fact that Isis may really have reasons to be hostile towards Russia does not, of course, rule out the possibility that Isis could have cooperated with a Ukrainian or Western entity in the terrorist attack in Moscow. After all, e.g. The USA has previously supported various extremist groups to achieve its own geopolitical goals.
Why didn't the FSB prevent the attack? - It obviously didn't have enough information about this beforehand. To the extent that the US intelligence had some more precise advance information about this attack, it did not share it with Russia, as it should have done, since the states are supposed to work together to eradicate terrorism.
Why did the FSB allow the terrorists to escape more than 300 km before stopping them? - Apparently, this was a deliberate action, with which the FSB wanted to get more information about what kind of network these terrorists operate as part of. The FSB apparently monitored the terrorists' phones during the escape journey, and the claim is based on that that a "window" had been opened for their escape to the Ukrainian border, from which they were approx. 70km away when they were arrested.
Apparently 🙂 The Finnish media, YLE, HS and other trash magazines have been to Moscow to investigate and interview these perpetrators of the terrorist act, probably on the same trip they visited the FSB's canteen and heard the agents bragging. Otherwise, their writings are in the same series as the fairy tales of the Thousand and One Nights.
WAR PSYCHOSIS IN DEVELOPMENT
The Finnish mainstream media participates in war propaganda with gross anti-Russian innuendos. The harsh lies of Ukraine are published as truths. Finland is occupied by the CIA with the help of the European Hybrid Competence Center. No one dares to defend Russia or Russians. This is exactly what is done when preparing an attack on Russia. Once the DCA agreement is approved by the parliament, the USA will occupy and arm the Finnish bases and conduct a false flag operation and the war can begin. I believe that US war hawks and Zionists want a world war with conventional weapons, because no one dares to use nuclear weapons. Finland will be like Ukraine if people are not brought to their senses.
Criticism is bitterly bitter towards the neighboring country, regardless of the form of government!!!
WAR PROPAGANDA IN DEVELOPMENT
Finnish mainstream media takes Ukrainian propaganda as truth. Finland is a country occupied by the CIA with the help of the European Hybrid Competence Center. The most outrageous anti-Russian opinions are published in the mainstream media as truths. Finns have been made to hate Russia to the core. When the parliament has approved the DCA agreement, the US will start equipping and occupying Finnish bases with American soldiers, and then the only thing missing is the US false flag attack and Finland is physically at war with Russia. US war hawks and Zionists are planning a third world war with conventional weapons, because no one dares to use nuclear weapons. In the world war, the USA aims to crush Russia, China and Iran. I hope the Finns will come to their senses and reject the US policy, that is, they will not agree to a war of aggression against Russia.
The Finnish people have been so thoroughly brainwashed into hatred of Russia that Russia can be demonized from absolutely anywhere without any significant public body or person questioning anything. Everyone believes in their brains as it is all the bad things said about Russia. If there are doubters in the group, they don't dare to share their doubts due to social pressure to preserve their reputation and/or status.
Today, all the news that mentions Russia has the same model, which no longer follows a single principle of journalism. We will publish any kind of claims that make the Russian president, the intelligence service, the military, and ultimately every citizen look as bad as possible. The truth has not only been discarded from the list of goals, it is of no interest in the slightest. All news about Russia tends to create an image of a threatening and dangerous state. Almost all defamatory claims are speculation that is allowed to marinate as "truth" without ever even attempting to provide evidence for the wild claims. Traditionally, this kind of reporting has been called "dirty journalism" in Finland. However, the expression is belittling to the extent that even a pile of dirt usually has some content.
Finnish journalists have not turned into zombies. They have only sold their principles either out of cowardice or with great enthusiasm. Finland is in an undeclared war against Russia and the actions are in line with it. There's no need to explain and explain the situation, almost the entire media is involved in reporting on the state of war. That won't change until a host from the Pentagon or Washington gives the editors-in-chief new instructions. If and when the war in Ukraine does not end with Russia's defeat, there will be no new instructions. The demonization of Russia in all communication is the new normal, to which we either submit or drown.
The path of destruction and suffering chosen by the majority of the so-called Western countries can be seen most clearly today in Gaza and Ukraine, but one should not imagine that there cannot be more scenes. The US is trying in every possible way to provoke China into military actions, which could lead to anything. If the war in Ukraine subsides, all its militaristic madness and evil will be transferred to the fate of Taiwan. Not because the US is strong, but because it is collapsing and doing so spectacularly. No empire and hegemony is eternal. Let's hope that the US hegemony will not collapse by setting the whole world on fire, but by quietly fading away, setback after setback. It is the only way to save this world we share.
Thank you for your reasonable opinion or rather the truth. There seem to be some very Russophobic comments here too.
Thanks for this analysis. Disgusting and sad to see how dirty and stuffy Finnish so-called journalism has become. I felt really dirty reading those claims, so ruthless has the mainstream media's desire to sow racist suspicion in the minds of Finns. This kind of what the Anglo-Saxons call "muddying the waters" confuses people's minds with various obscure theories so that they don't start thinking too much about what role Ukraine - or maybe the CIA and MI6 - had behind these actions.
Finland is unfortunately deep in that quagmire where the NWO corporate mafia is trying to force Russia into a nuclear war!
I don't usually speculate on the causes and consequences of events, but the summary of the story about simultaneous claims about Russia's own involvement in the act of terrorism makes me think about the reason for the statements. It cannot be a question of a new miraculous episode of insanity in the prevailing hysteria, but there is clearly a campaign behind it that has a certain goal and has been launched by some entity. This entity can be the newly elected governor of Finland or a local branch of the "deep state", whose members are apparently listed in the story.
What is the purpose of the statements? Is the purpose just to confuse the Finns' heads more and more thoroughly? It has no effect on Russia's actions in Ukraine. Russia does not need any terrorist attacks to support its actions, it will implement its plan to demilitarize Ukraine regardless. The campaign projects the West's own escalation goals onto Russia. The purpose is to create an atmosphere in support of the fact that NATO must send its own troops to Ukraine, because its army is at the point of collapse. When it is repeated that after the surrender of Ukraine, Russia will continue the attack, it would be unpleasant to notice that this is not the case. The Russian threat would vanish and the value of the shares of the military industrial complex would collapse.
The French Napoleon would perhaps like to gather a few thousand soldiers on the Dnieper with the help of the most enthusiastic NATO partners to "stop" the Russian advance. That way he could declare that he saved Europe. This could only be possible if Zelensky was pressured into a peace agreement and therefore to give up his goal of returning the border to the situation of 2014. Otherwise, we would end up in a situation where Russia would grind those NATO troops to pieces as long as there are enough of them for cannon fodder. If this is the West's plan, it doesn't look very promising. Let's see when Finland starts announcing volunteers to join Macron's legion.
Yes, some kind of face washing or "honorable" retreat may be planned here after years of lying and cheating. It is appropriate to hope that they are really planning to withdraw from that project, when the goal (the disintegration of Russia) does not seem to be achieved by exploiting Ukraine.
On the other hand, when they were already ready to invest hundreds of billions of money and hundreds of thousands of lives to crush Russia with the help of Ukraine, it is possible that the sacrifice will continue in addition to Ukraine with other willing people and regions. This is at least indicated by the war propaganda activities, especially in Finland, the Baltic countries and Poland. Almost any means of provoking Russia or even forcing Russia to escalate by blaming Russia will go through with these nations.
The best way to identify the perpetrators of the terrorist act in Moscow is to look at who or who are shouting straight in the media that Russia is the perpetrator of the act. Do you remember the same phenomenon when the Baltic Sea gas pipeline was blown up by the Americans. Exactly the same explanation and blaming Russia even then.
The FSB is not fooled by this bullshit, it is intended only for stupid citizens who read and listen to and believe all the bullshit the media leaks.
Right! since 2014, Russia has been accused of everything really strange, such as killing civilians in Donbas, although not once did the OSCE observers confirm this, even though there were Russophobes. In the same category as the IAEA observers at the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant, who do not notice in any way who is bombing the plant, the UN is such a rogue institution when it comes to implementing Agenda2030, God bless the USA, that something should be done about it. Unicef is also begging for money only for the children of Ukraine, although it did nothing to help the children of Donbass, whom Ukrainian Nazis have been killing for 10 years now by bombing schools and throwing grenades in playgrounds.
It occurred to me, when the scope and nature of the shocking attack in Moscow became clear, that none of the so-called a state actor embarks on such a suicide project. However, this perception seems to be gaining ground. Dmitri Trenin, a member of the Russian Foreign and Defense Policy Council, assessed Ukraine's involvement on RIAC's website yesterday. Trenin wrote that if, for example, the connection of the Ukrainian intelligence service to the attack is proven, it will inevitably implicate the president of Ukraine as well. In that case, President Putin would no longer be bound by his promise to Israel's previous prime minister, Naftali Bennett, of personal immunity for Zelensky. If these possibilities materialize, the consequences are unimaginable.
UK MP George Galloway:
When the US, UK and others quickly tried to assure me that it was only ISIS that committed this mass murder in Moscow, I automatically knew they were lying. And this is what I discovered.
First of all, I discovered that no one had explained President Barack Obama's unannounced visit to meet with British politicians and security officials in Downing Street three days before this terrorist crime was committed.
Researching even further, I discovered that Victoria Nuland, this harbinger of death, this angel of death who, if she comes near you, rest assured, civil war is coming to your country. I saw her with my own eyes, she promised the Russians some nasty surprises in the coming weeks and months.
I investigate further and find that White House Press Secretary John Kirby announced that American citizens have been warned to stay away from crowded places, including malls and theaters, in the great city of Moscow, the Greatest city in Europe, the capital of the Greatest country is Earth.
And here I have three pieces of evidence that lead me to believe that the United States, NATO allies and their puppet servant, the state of Ukraine, the stump state of Ukraine, are in fact responsible for this mass murder.
BBC Obama visit in London:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZcpmU4-bb0
Tucker Tulsi: Obama Clinton Power:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOzsEcM8M4U
Suomalaismedia does not blame Russia for that attack, it just does not rule out the possibility that the attack was carried out by the Russians themselves. It wouldn't be the first time in Russian history that this happened. If Russia is able to attack civilian targets abroad in the spirit of terrorism, then what would stop it from doing the same in its own country, after all, the purpose is to sanctify the means. Yes, the western intelligence services warned about the attack, but Russia did not listen to it. An unbiased investigation of this, too, is not going to happen nowadays.
A Russian does objective research work, only a Russophobe can claim that it is biased.
It's not just Finnish media. The media and elites of all European countries, even neutral Switzerland, as well as North America, Australia, and New Zealand, tell the same stories in almost the same words. The source of the stories is located in the dim chambers of cia and nearby story houses (think tanks). The fact that everyone else is also lying cannot, of course, be used to justify the shameful behavior of the Finnish media.
Ps. Joppe could use his free time to educate himself. Honest, academic-level research information about events in Ukraine can be found in plenty in Finnish libraries as well. However, most of them are foreign languages.
Thank you!
The "Suomalaismedia does not blame the Russians" line reveals an attitude injury. Is not that right?
What is the cause of this belittling of the Russian Federation?
It is important to remember that the ethical standards of journalism require honesty, accuracy, impartiality and fairness. Although criticism and differing views are an essential part of a free society, journalists should avoid unwarranted belittling and strive to present diverse perspectives. The media's role is to inform, spark discussion and, if necessary, criticize those in power, but it must do so responsibly and in accordance with ethical principles.
Thank you!
The Finnish media journalists' interpretations of the Moscow concert hall shootings and "own conclusions" mentioned in the story are like a direct quote from the iivana stories of the guardianship councils' Hakkapelitta magazine from the 1930s.
Nazi German dictator Adolf Hitler and his assistants once arrived (June 4.6.1942, 75) for the XNUMXth birthday of the Finnish Army Commander-in-Chief Carl Mannerheim. Sitting next to the President of the Republic Risto Ryt at the birthday table, Hitler recounted Germany's war plans in the Soviet Union:
"We will raze Moscow and Leningrad to the ground and kill all their inhabitants. After all, the Russians aren't even human, so our joint mission is to destroy them as cancerous from this world."
Hitler's words are carefully recorded in the annals, but what did the president of the republic Rytin answer to Hitler about "our common mission"?
The same echo is the steps!
Martti Pelho
Saundersfoot
Cymru (eng. Wales)
An interesting assessment of terrorist attacks in Russia during the Putin era (google translation from Telegram):
The “world community,” that is, the Anglo-Saxons, turned to Putin in their familiar language: “Calm down! Stop winning! Stop or you'll have problems like this.”
Yes, this is exactly what they did Yesterday in Moscow is translated from Anglo-Saxon. This is exactly how they addressed him 20 years ago, when we pinched the tail of militants, who the west was trained and equipped.
They decided to take the then young (in the sense, not very experienced) President out of fear. And the whole country at the same time.
20 years ago they gave him a choice (2002 Dubrovka Theater and 2004 Beslan school hostage): “What are you going to do now? Will you attack the militants along with the hostages or will you release them? You understand that both options work against you, right? Surrender and accept our terms.”
20 years ago, Putin did not accept the conditions, he accepted the challenge.
What do we have now? The perpetrators of the attack did not make any demands – they did it and ran away. The "civilized world" immediately declared that it had nothing to do with it.
And the state power clearly deciphers the signal sent to it: "We warned: Putin should not serve a new term. You didn't listen, and now we will rock the situation in the country in this way, don't be offended.¨
This is a new challenge. The authorities must respond to it. For the average person, find and punish the perpetrators. But for customers – the Anglo-Saxons – a completely different answer is needed: adequate, sobering and preferably fast. And there is no need to waste time looking for "evidence". Everyone understands who made the hole in Nord Stream, without any evidence. It's the same here: it's them, there's simply no-one else.
The West has decided to move the fight against us into a new space, and we (primarily the authorities) need to look for a solution to the problem. Preferably, without delay, since Europe is already being prepared with all its might to replace the agonizing Kyiv junta.
thank you
Scott Ritter is a pro at solving things like a terrorist act that happened. From here https://www.scottritterextra.com/ find his analysis of this event. It really doesn't support the western hypothesis, not to mention the nonsense of the Finnish crap press.
And he has enough listeners, His analyzes are already shared by many tube users, in their own videos. YT seems to be censoring his own.
YT started censoring Scott's own channel by deleting it a long time ago. Since then, his weekly (Tuesday and Friday) "Ask the Inspector" quiz shows on Tour of Duty were also removed. They continue on the Rumble service.
His account was also removed from Twitter until Elon Musk restored it. Dangerous Man brings Scott Ritter apparently to some. "Western free information" reveals its true face.
The fact is that the vast majority of these Internet services are part of the US network of influence. That's where the floating plant is in Washington. When Musk bought the Twitter service, he made reporter Matt Taibb and his teams look for evidence, e.g. Hillary Clinton's alleged influence of Russian trolls on the US election 2016. No trace found. Instead, they found a lot of evidence of Twitter's connections to the US administration and the CIA and the FBI. This Elon Musk seems to be a slightly different oligarch.
Now here is an unresolved contradiction. When domestic media reporters are so sharp (even Sherlock Holmes comes in second) that they solve a crime like a crime under a unit of time... then why the hell is our media full of stupid garbage and lies and propaganda???
Now Russia has identified the planners of the terrorist attack in Moscow. And as you might have guessed, the culprits can be found in Ukraine. From there, the spymaster Vasily Maljuk and a number of other culprits have been demanded for sentencing in Russia. We'll see if the western newspapers write anything or if they accept it as propaganda. The FSB did its job efficiently and quickly. Thank you!
It took a long time before the neighboring club mentioned anything about the whole attack. They probably waited for the instructions of the St. Petersburg office to see what kind of truth would come to light. Well, now the culprits have been found, and this time there is no need to invent a crime. Yes, the fsb knows, there is a lot of trust. Surely, in exchange, Russia agrees to hand over war criminals, just like that in the name of equality?
Yep, an old Finnish proverb says: "First we investigate the matter, then we talk about it".
Thank you!
Isis volunteered to be guilty, they were not "found". So should Isis's statement be doubted? I think it's as Putin said: the people who ordered the attack are not yet known.
That's the way it should be and notice that that's the Finnish way of doing things. Yes, the Russian modus operandi includes finding the culprit first, and then inventing the crime. Strangely, other countries warned about this in advance and, oh, strangely, it happened right after the "elections".
Joppe, do you remember the explosion of the Nord Stream-2 pipe.. Yes, immediately in the coverage of it, even the "finger" of the Finnish media pointed at Putin...
This Joppe is an "unpaid" western troll who gets paid as much as we do from Moscow hah hah... It's not worth wasting gunpowder on these. Not worth it.
For those who think that Russia ordered the attack, a few questions:
Would Russia like to undermine the sense of security of its own country's inhabitants in such a drastic way now that Ukraine has already extended the war to Russia's side?
Would allowing the act give a positive message to the Russian people about the operational capability and vigilance of the state security service? Would it increase the confidence of the people in their leaders in a situation where the nation is at war? So would it be good for Putin if the Russians do not trust the ability of their own security service to protect citizens from terrorist attacks?
And as we have seen, it is impossible to hold Ukraine accountable for the attack, so what is the benefit to Russia of this bloodbath?
I think these are logical, reasonable questions.